The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 10, 2025.
Petitioner: The GEO Group, Inc.Respondent: Alejandro Menocal.
Advocates: Dominic E. Draye (for the Petitioner)
Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Respondents)
Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus ...
The GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal
Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Nov 10, 2025.
Petitioner: The GEO Group, Inc.
Respondent: Alejandro Menocal.
Advocates:
- Dominic E. Draye (for the Petitioner)
- Jennifer D. Bennett (for the Respondents)
- Sopan Joshi (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondents)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Alejandro Menocal and other immigration detainees brought a class action lawsuit against The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO), a private company that operates the Aurora Immigration Processing Center (AIPC) in Colorado under contract with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). GEO maintained a mandatory Sanitation Policy requiring all detainees to clean common areas including walls, floors, bathrooms, and recreation yards. Detainees who refused these cleaning assignments faced escalating disciplinary actions, beginning with suspension of television and phone privileges and potentially resulting in solitary confinement for up to seventy-two hours. Menocal, detained from June to September 2014, witnessed fellow detainees placed in isolation for refusing to clean, and multiple detainees testified to being threatened with or actually placed in solitary confinement for noncompliance. Additionally, AIPC operated a Voluntary Work Program where detainees could work up to eight hours daily in various jobs such as food preparation, barbering, and laundry services for compensation of $1.00 per day.
Menocal filed suit in October 2014, alleging forced labor under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act for the mandatory cleaning program and unjust enrichment under Colorado common law for the $1.00 daily wage in the Voluntary Work Program. The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado certified two classes in 2017, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed in 2018. Following discovery, GEO moved for summary judgment claiming derivative sovereign immunity under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. The district court denied GEO's motion in October 2022, finding that ICE neither directed nor required GEO to compel detainee labor or limit compensation to $1.00 per day. GEO appealed this denial to the Tenth Circuit, which dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Question
Is an order denying a government contractor’s claim of derivative sovereign immunity immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine?