The headlines move fast, but America’s core ideas move the needle. We open with a surprising deep dive into the Monroe Doctrine—penned by John Quincy Adams and issued by President James Monroe—and connect it to modern policy choices around Venezuela and hemispheric security. When you judge action...
The headlines move fast, but America’s core ideas move the needle. We open with a surprising deep dive into the Monroe Doctrine—penned by John Quincy Adams and issued by President James Monroe—and connect it to modern policy choices around Venezuela and hemispheric security. When you judge action by founding-era principles instead of social media noise, foreign policy looks less like a personality contest and more like constitutional muscle memory at work.
From there, we head west to a major shift in the Ninth Circuit. A two-to-one ruling leaned on the Supreme Court’s Bruin decision to strike down California’s open carry restrictions in large counties, arguing that firearm regulations must align with the nation’s historical tradition. The state claimed citizens could apply for licenses, yet admitted none had been issued. That gap between policy on paper and rights in practice is exactly what the new Second Amendment framework is designed to expose, and it marks a notable change in a circuit once nicknamed the “Ninth Circus.”
Then we pivot to the First Circuit, where a three-judge panel affirmed Congress’s authority to defund abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, through clear appropriations language. The kicker: all three judges were appointed by President Biden. Beyond the culture-war headlines, the ruling reinforces a fundamental constitutional truth—the power of the purse belongs to the legislature. When Congress speaks plainly, courts should not invent spending mandates.
Across these stories, one pattern emerges: history, text, and institutional roles still decide outcomes. Whether it’s the Monroe Doctrine guiding regional boundaries, Bruin reshaping Second Amendment litigation, or Article I controlling federal dollars, the system works best when we remember how it’s built. If you’re tired of hot takes and ready for substance, you’ll find a straightforward playbook here: measure policies against founding principles and let that standard do the sorting.
If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend who loves history with teeth, and leave a quick review so more listeners can find us. Your take: which precedent should guide today’s leaders the most?
Support the show